commit f5d0139e3efba9a7566d696842d4c78e6c5541ac
parent f0c3cd34c4f3cbbfe099d4a4a36fa3b4cfc9841d
Author: arg@localhost.localdomain <unknown>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:04:58 +0000
typo fix
Diffstat:
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sta.li/faq.md b/sta.li/faq.md
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ A general conclusion is, the more dynamic libraries an executable depends on,
the slower it'll start, regardless if the libraries are preloaded or not.
This also means that usually big static executables (which we try to avoid)
easily outperform dynamic executables with lots of dependencies. If a big
-static executable is already running, executed another one is nearly
+static executable is already running, executing another one is nearly
instantaniously, because the payload is already in the memory. In the dynamic
case the startup is not instantaniously because the dynamic linker has to make
sure that there were no updates in the dependencies.
