commit da1adad0f422f8a2b306139fc799a0916aa99082
parent 6166980efa93a7b5708bcad70f06784df78ffd6d
Author: nsz <nszabolcs@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:18:27 +0100
gsoc page: typo fixes
Diffstat:
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/www.suckless.org/GSoC2009.md b/www.suckless.org/GSoC2009.md
@@ -95,9 +95,9 @@ to bring the Unix philosophy onto the desktop and into the land of graphical
applications. We believe that there is big potential for doing similiar things
for other purposes as well such as managing contacts, bookmarks, browsing
files/directories, reading/managing mails, organizing/viewing images/videos and
-listing to music, in a very elegant but Unix-like way. We believe that such tools
-should have a GUI but communicate via standard I/O and be very flexible in the
-combination of their purposes.
+listening to music, in a very elegant but Unix-like way. We believe that such
+tools should have a GUI but communicate via standard I/O and be very flexible in
+the combination of their purposes.
### Port dwm to different platforms
@@ -111,13 +111,13 @@ concepts in mainstream software.
There might also be the opportunity to make dwm itself more friendly with
well-established desktop environments, to integrate well with Gnome or KDE in
-order to proof that dynamic and tiled window management should be the default
+order to prove that dynamic and tiled window management should be the default
in future window management concepts.
### ddm
There is no suckless display manager for X11 at the moment, thus a new
-dynamic display manager (ddm) should designed and implemented.
+dynamic display manager (ddm) should be designed and implemented.
### stm
@@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ We'd like to see a lightweight and simple alternative to gnome-volume-manager
and similiar programs.
### Yet another less sucking editor
+
Although vi(m) does its job, it has become a monster during the time. We
believe there is a gap between ed, sam, acme and vim which must be filled with
a completely new less sucking editor.
@@ -171,7 +172,7 @@ use of C++, so that it's desirable to have an improved tcc.
We are also concerned about recent attempts to implement the C front-end of gcc
in C++. We believe that is a bad decision in general (due to demanding C++ as
-bootstrapping environment) and would like to get rid from the gcc dependency
+bootstrapping environment) and would like to get rid of the gcc dependency
for these reasons.
We'd like to see that the improved tcc is able to build all suckless projects
