commit 9c42127c2f8da8db83820313cb22d6680282583f
parent 96df1befcea5f608b9d4947dcee0c3269a4fbb87
Author: Neven Sajko <nsajko@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 02:50:23 +0100
Correct a writing error
Or should the case have been changed?
Diffstat:
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sta.li/faq.md b/sta.li/faq.md
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ sure that there were no updates in the dependencies.
So all in all dynamic executables are painfully slow, regardless what hacks on
top people came up with in the past. There is zero evidence that dynamic
linking makes executables faster. There is only some evidence that preloading
-dynamic libraries vs no preloading dynamic libraries improves the startup of
+dynamic libraries vs not preloading dynamic libraries improves the startup of
dynamic executables. But the introduction of preloading comes to a cost as
well, the kernel will have to do much more work when supporting such hacks.
